You are here: Home » Blog » New SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash Card: Too Fast, Too Large, Too Expensive
Advertisement

New SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash Card: Too Fast, Too Large, Too Expensive

by Rhonda Callow on January 7, 2011 · 32 comments

Print Friendly

Wednesday, at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2011 in Las Vegas, SanDisk announced the newest addition to their family of memory cards: the SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash 128GB card. What makes this card better than the rest? In their press release, SanDisk is calling it the world’s fastest high-capacity CompactFlash® card.

So, just how fast is fast? The 128GB SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash card has write speeds of up to 100MB/s. Compared to SanDisk’s Extreme CompactFlash cards that boast 60MB/s, that’s an extra 40MB/s. Further, the new CompactFlash card has a whopping 128GB of storage space.

How much will the new SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash card set you back? A staggering $1500. So, just how important is size and speed to you?

In my opinion, for what it’s worth, I don’t think this card is worth its cost. Why? For two reasons: 1) I prefer to have several smaller-sized cards rather than one large card, and 2) the extra write speed offered isn’t so important to me that I’m willing to spend the extra money on it. Let’s take a closer look at how I feel:

I’m not one for putting all my eggs in one basket, which is essentially what I’d be doing if I were to purchase a 128GB card. In SanDisk’s defense, they have released other Extreme Pro cards that come in different sizes (16GB, 32GB, and 64GB, in addition to the 128GB) BUT – and this is a big BUT – these smaller-sized cards have a write speed of “only” 90MB/s, not the 100MB/s the largest card offers.

Since we can’t fairly compare the 128GB Extreme Pro to any of the Extreme CompactFlash line of cards because the latter doesn’t come in such a large storage size, let’s compare the price of the two 32GB options (the largest the Extreme comes in):

The 32GB SanDisk Extreme CompactFlash card costs $415 and has write speeds of up to 60MB/s.

The 32GB SanDisk Extreme Pro CompactFlash card costs $560 and has write speeds of up to 90MB/s.

Is the additional 30MB/s write speeds worth an extra $145 to you?

Yes, the speed of a memory card is important to some degree but, for me, it’s not an extra $145 important. Shooting in continuous burst mode (which is what will benefit from such a fast card) isn’t something I do very often, I’m more the type of photographer that has an image in my mind before I shoot, and like to take my time composing my shot, rather than going in with my eyes closed and hoping for the best.

With that said, I can appreciate the photographer who could benefit from the extra write speed, such as those shooting fast-action sports or even wedding photographers who don’t want to miss a single moment. I’m not turning my nose up at SanDisk’s newest, fastest, largest CompactFlash card, I just don’t think it’s for everyone.

Also from SanDisk’s press release (linked to above):

Best-in-class quality assurance offers photographers peace of mind knowing that the card is backed by rigorous stress, shock, vibration, humidity and moisture testing procedures and a lifetime limited warranty. The card features RTV silicone coating for added protection.

That all sounds great, but I have to wonder about the limited part in the warranty. Will that cover my clumsy arse when I drop the card and it gets trampled by a heard of elk or eaten by a black bear when I’m in the field shooting wildlife? Maybe that scenario is somewhat unlikely, but you get my point. I’d rather lose a $145 8GB card than a $1500 128GB one.

Photoletariat readers: how important is the speed and size of a memory card to you and your photography needs? Leave a comment to share your thoughts!

—————
Click here to sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Bookmark and Share
Advertisements
  • Pingback: The Photoletariat

  • Pingback: Adam Jacobs

  • Pingback: Rhonda Callow

  • Pingback: Photo-Twitt

  • SZphoto

    Perhaps it is ideal in HD shooting, that probably is why they are is an image of clapboard on it. No one would find this practical for still shooting.

  • http://williamspictures.com Rob

    How long before that thing's $50?

  • Pingback: Black and Geauxld

  • Bobby

    A lot of professional HD video is now shot on DSLR. That's their intended market for this product. I should imagine there's a fairly small market for it, but i'm sure someone, somewhere is very excited – even if it is Sanjay Mehrota.

  • Pingback: Brian O'Neil

  • Pingback: Brian O'Neil

  • Pingback: Freddy Sarabia

  • Pingback: Wolfgang Heisel

  • http://www.vertizonphoto.com Jim

    I agree that still shooters are definitively not the market for this sort of storage. I only recently jumped to 16 GB cards and that's even a bit scary when thinking of loosing half an assignment due to an absent minded moment. But do the math on 20 minutes of HD video footage and you'll quickly see who needs and wants this card. Admittedly, at $1500, the who's maybe counted on one hand at the moment, but as the price is sure to drop and technology (read: megapixels and in-camera processor speeds) sure to advance, there will likely be a convergence in the not too distant future. It's so cool to watch it all happen!

  • Kev

    The only ones who need the speed are those shooting video with DSLR cameras. It's the 10x speed vs 6x speed. I just did this the other day. I went to buy 2-16gig cards, but they were sold out. So I ended up getting a 32gig hoodman RAW card. Two reasons–1 lifetime warranty and 2 it's made in the USA.

  • Gary Landon

    Hi Rhonda , I had just asked sandisk what they recommend for my D700 nikon and they suggested
    sandisk extreme pro Wow $341.99 for 16GB card luckily the sandisk extreme 8GB minus the pro is
    only $58.00 aud so guess what I'm buying because I think that I would not see any difference between
    the two. All I can say they are not to interested in selling the pro or it would be priced more competitively.
    regards drecked

  • A. Henson

    I can see large companies buying a few of these once Sandisk lowers the price to ~$600-1000)to use for HD video. We currently use a Sony HD cam with a memory unit and a Canon 5D Mark II for HD video and we use 16 GB CF cards. If we strictly shot video all the time (it is new part of our Creative Dept.), I can see the potential for having 128 GB cards. Recently, I shot an instructional video that spanned three days of 8 hour shoots on the two cameras. One card per camera per day would have been nice. :)

  • Me

    Well considering that the 5D for instance limits you to 4GB at a crack or 20 minutes then unless you want of bunch of 4GB shots in a row the card really doesn't serve any purpose. Besides like the article said, you really want to loose an entire feature length of raw footage if the card screws up? That is why film people had a term called “dailes”. That was the film shot that one day so if something screwed up you could re-do it.
    No this is nothing more then Sandisk flexing their e-peen muscle and trying to impress gullible pro-am photographers.

  • Ephotola

    Maybe the largest but sure not the fastest, HoodmanUSA has their RAW cards at 675X 100 MB/s made in the USA http://bit.ly/bkQNGl They have been on the market for a while and comes with a life time warranty.

  • Michael

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/…

    SanDisk 32Gig Extreme 60/mbs $155 where did you get 400 from?

  • Rjsphoto

    Regarding cards have a write speed of ” 90MB/s, 100MB/s. I could never get a proper comparison of Sandisk,PNY, Lexar, Transcend, HoodmanUSA, Sony… to name a 'few'.
    Is Sandisk's 128GB card really the fastest???? At any size, who's is the fastest????

  • adawei

    Article is very interesting,thanks for your sharing.I will visit this site.And welcome to wedding dresses online shop.We supply supply high quality Cheap wedding dresses,wedding dresses 2011.We have been dress business 20 years and you can trust us completely.Our wedding dress shop have Evening Dresses,Prom Dresses,mother of the bride dresses,A-Line Wedding Dresses,Empire Wedding Dresses,Bridesmaid Dresses and so on.You can find your dream Beach Wedding Dresses here.We do retail and wholesale wedding dresses business.Choose http://www.weddingdressesshop…./, get your wedding dresses UK right now!

  • Pingback: Brett Callow

  • Stefan S.

    Stefan S.

    It depend on what you compare.

    If you compare 15 MB/s vs. 60 MB/s it is worth the costs.
    If you compare 60 MB/s vs. 100 MB/s you have to be very rich! (C:

    I became a 15 MB/s card as a gift and did only use it once. I had to wait about one second to regard the next picture on the camera screen, really not funny at all! But working with 45 MB/s- and 60 MB/s-cards is very OK. I can take pictures in full Raw-format up to 8 pics/s and don't even feel that i have to wait a while. At least i picture mainly landscapes and macros, so that i don't really need the frame rate like sport fotographers. For me, 45 to 60 MB/s is enough (15 MB/s too less).

    I always buy 8 GB-cards, these are not too expensive and until now 4 cards in my bag were more than enough. I shoot always in Raw-mode, for 12 MP that means more than 300 pictures on one 8 GB-card. If you get problems with a card while shooting (luckily it did not happen until now), you have the pictures from the other card(s) at least. If you have the whole day on one 32 (128) GB-card you will soon start crying… (C:

    The price: my first 8 GB-CF-card did cost Euro 120 two years ago (45 MB/s), now it costs about Euro 65 (60 MB/s).

  • Pingback: Motojournalism

  • Bobby A.

    If you shoot events and weddings and the like, I believe it's clinically insane to use high capacity cards. I know some shooters that brag about shooting their entire wedding on a single 64gb card — and my simple but critical argument is: what if the card fails? Yes, you can get a replacement card, but not a replacement wedding.
    I see no practical, professional use for a card so large – unless you are in a position to *need* the extra size. Otherwise, how hard is it to change your CF card when it gets full?

  • Stuart

    Quite frankly I can't see the point in shelling out this kind of money on a card, however quick it might be. I would rather get a couple more Elinchrom heads or a new razor sharp 85MM plus have money in hand afterwards. I still shoot raw on 8m cards, weither on location or in the studio. As long as they are quicker than the flash regen time then that's quick enough for me and all because it's quick doesn't make you a better photographer either!

  • Stuart

    Quite frankly I can't see the point in shelling out this kind of money on a card, however quick it might be. I would rather get a couple more Elinchrom heads or a new razor sharp 85MM plus have money in hand afterwards. I still shoot raw on 8G cards, weither on location or in the studio. As long as they are quicker than the flash regen time then that's quick enough for me and all because it's quick doesn't make you a better photographer either!

  • Pingback: Rhonda Callow

  • http://twitter.com/rhondacallow Rhonda Callow

    Hi Michael,

    The price has dropped since publication, but it is still over $300: http://www.sandisk.com/product…

  • Darren Anthony

    I can bet Chase Jarvis could put this card to great use.

  • james braselton

    hi there yeah i want out now i am soo board with slow hard drives got 2 8 gb sd-hci with 45 mb/s read write speeds

  • michael Wigle

    Video in full HD on a Canon 5D mkii. That is what this camera is for. Wait till the mkiii goes 4k and 5k, then this card will see small.

Previous post:

Next post:

Advertisement