You are here: Home » Blog » Do You Shoot More Photos Now Than You Used To?
Advertisement

Do You Shoot More Photos Now Than You Used To?

by Dan Bailey on July 13, 2010 · 9 comments

Print Friendly

Think back to that time when you picked up your first camera and started down this road of photography. For some of you, maybe that was only last year. For others, it that might have been ten or twenty years ago, if not more.

Chances are, during that time when everything was magical and new, and you were only just beginning to fall in love with the process of image making, you used to shoot photos like crazy and your burned through film rolls and memory cards like they were were going out of style. That’s how you learned, right? The more photos you shot, the more you became familiar with your equipment and understood how the camera responds to the light of the world.

As time went on, you got better. Your skills improved and you started to better recognize what would make a great subject or a compelling photograph, and you probably became a little more selective with how many photos you’d shoot. Your finger started to exercise restraint on the shutter button. You no longer needed to bracket exposures or vary your compositions quite as much to ensure that you got the shot.

Then you factor in the digital thing, where you can preview and delete shots as soon as you take them, unlike the days of old, when you blew through roll after roll and wondered what the heck your photos would look like when they came back from the lab. Digital allows us to be even more selective about what we shoot, or at least keep.

At the same time, though, there are no more processing costs. All the costs with digital are loaded on the front end; once you buy your camera and memory card, it doesn’t cost any more to shoot fifty frames or fifty thousand frames. This has probably upped your number of shot photos during the past few years, right? I know it’s given me a bigger sense of freedom when shooting.

Then there’s the simple aspect of trying new things and pushing your creativity, even though you may have been at this for years. In fact, if you’re a more experienced photographer, you’re expected to remain innovative and come up with new photographic ideas all the time, especially if you shoot stock and your income depends on delivering a large body of fresh new work every year. This means shooting even more images as you continue to practice your craft, although the numbers of similar shots you create during a shoot may be significantly lower than the sheer number of individual subjects that you capture on any given day, since you’re much better and nailing the shot on the first or second try now.

How has all this jumble of technology, technical proficiency, creativity and experience affected your selective eye and shooting style over the years? Do you shoot more frames now than you used to? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this.

———-

Dan Bailey is a professional adventure, outdoor and travel photographer based in Anchorage, Alaska. You can follow his own blog at danbaileyphoto.com/blog and see his daily Facebook updates at facebook.com/danbaileyphoto

Bookmark and Share
Advertisements
  • Pingback: The Photoletariat

  • Mouring

    It's a mixed bag for me. If I'm comfortable and I have a handle on the lighting I take less pictures and I have a higher percentage of “keepers.” If I'm handed a new camera, a new lens, or doing more “risky shooting” (e.g. very slow shutter speed hand held or “run-and-gun” style) I tend to shoot more. However, It's always less than what I've shot a few years ago even if I'm doing risky shooting.

    Why? I know what my camera and post-processing very well at this point, and knowing that at a glance if I have a shot means I can move on with confidence if I'm on a tight shooting schedule.

  • http://xanato.net maique

    digital made the big difference, in my opinion.

    personally, i carry a small compact all the time, and i did have a smaller camera before, but it wasn't just there ALL the time.

    as far as work goes, it does make a huge difference.
    i shoot a lot more, a lot. as you so well put it, it allows for those new things, or riskier shots. i have never felt i should step back, or left something untried, for money reasons. if i wanted to try something i would. if i had to go through 10 rolls of film trying to do something i would. if that needed only one, that would be fine too. but i just wouldn't shoot as much as i do now.

    the part that's really a huge improvement on my quality of life is processing time.

    no processing is a big plus, and not for the costs alone.
    processing time on assignment could be critical. there's a huge difference when you had to develop two rolls of film, or ten. apart from the logistics of carrying all the developing gear, and chemicals to match, along with tons of film, the whole processing bit was always a nightmare.

    getting the pictures back to the newsroom when you're working with very tight deadlines could be a lot trickier than today.

    there were so many variables to consider that i feel this is the biggest plus of digital.

    i don't have to worry about having enough water (and getting it to the right temperature), enough chemical packs to develop the whole thing for the duration of the assignment, go through drying the film and cutting it, before going through the scanning process (if you've ever met a vintage leafax machine you have to LOVE digital) and transmitting it back to the paper.
    even on the more recent sat-phone years, packing all the processed film and making sure nothing was left behind on some crazy hotel… that was a lot of weight to carry around, a lot of excess baggage money, and an all-around pain.

    simply going through the photos, editing my work, with the loupe and a light table, looking at negatives instead of a huge preview on screen would take a lot longer than today.

    digital has cut a considerable amount of time on a lot of stages, and i feel the 'new' digital workflow allows me to go through a lot more photos in the same time. so i shoot more photos and get a bigger choice when the time comes to edit.

    not sure if this is a bit off the 'do you shoot more?' issue, but i do believe i do. a lot more.

  • Pingback: David Hawkins-Weeks

  • Pingback: Booom

  • Pingback: talenthouse

  • http://smallvoiceblog.blogspot.com/ Scott Bryant

    I'm a newspaper photojournalist, and I definitely tend to shoot more, overall. It's freeing to not have to worry about how many rolls of film are in your bag. I'm never afraid to lay on the motor drive. You still have to anticipate moments, but it's nice to know you can keep shooting bursts when the subject calls for it.

    It's REAL nice when shooting sports. I've mostly worked for smaller publications, so I would pack about 15 rolls of film on a sports assignment. Now, sometimes I may shoot 1,500 or more frames at a college football game. That's almost 42 rolls of film!!! I can keep on shooting all the action, the re-action, the fans, everything. I use PhotoMechanic, and that makes quick work of downloading, adding metadata, and editing.

    Plus, these days, I tend to shoot a lot of visual notes that can help when writing captions. In the film days, you didn't want to waste a lot of frames doing that. That meant having to take a lot of notes, and when you're writing, you're not shooting. But now I can shoot pictures of signs and nametags and environmental details that can help me accurately explain the proper context in which a photograph was taken.

    Ultimately, though, it depends on the subject and the assignment. Sometimes, you want to slow down. Force yourself to think about what you're shooting instead of simply reacting. You can actually miss shots by shooting bursts, even at 6-11 frames per second. Just to maintain some discipline at times, I'll switch to the single frame mode.

    Digital cameras are a godsend for photojournalists. Photoshop, on the other hand, that's another can of worms …

  • http://danbaileyphoto.com/blog Dan Bailey

    Scott, that's a great tip you give of shooting photos of handwritten notes, signs and other cues that can help you caption your photos later. I used to try and jot down things in small notebooks, but then later on you end up losing the note, or can't remember which photos they went with. Digital makes it very easy to shoot reference photos, and they'll show up right there with the images when you go to edit.

  • Pingback: John Javellana

Previous post:

Next post:

Advertisement