You are here: Home » Blog » 5 Things We Don’t Miss About Non-Digital Photography
Advertisement

5 Things We Don’t Miss About Non-Digital Photography

by Dan Bailey on January 11, 2011 · 26 comments

Print Friendly

Oh, how we love digital photography!

By now, most of us are on our second or third DSLR camera body, fourth or more for the full time pro shooters, and we’re well entrenched in our new shooting, editing and processing workflows.

Digital photography is the way of the world now, so much so that Chase Jarvis thinks we ought to dump the word “digital” and just go back to calling it photography. Maybe he’s right. We can debate that another day. Go leave a comment on his blog about it if you disagree.

At any rate, let’s take a minute to look back at those pre-digital days. No, not to reminisce and gush about all the reasons why film was so much better than digital. You’ll have to find another blog for that too.

No, just the opposite. We’re going to run down a few of the things we DON’T miss about those long lost days. Follow along – You know what they are.

1. Photo submissions Remember when you had to pull slides from numerous boxes and file drawers when you wanted to send images to a client? And then you had to package them up with cardboard, plastic bags and tape, and then stuff them into a Fed Ex envelope. If you were lucky, the driver came and picked them up, but more likely you got the request at 4:00 PM and had to get it out by 5:00, which meant racing to the nearest Fed Ex dropoff location.

2. Putting slides away Of course every photo that you sent out had to be returned to it’s correct page in the box or file. How many hours did we spend refiling slides or paying someone to do the job each week? I always got behind on that task and to this day there are still pages of slides sitting in my office storage in Colorado that I never got around to refiling before I moved to Alaska.

3. Scanning slides There was that transition period between film and digital when we discovered the benefits of delivering digitally scanned images to clients. Remember how long it took to scan a page of 20 slides to hi res? Yea, I don’t miss that, although one of these days, I may find myself going back and scanning more of my older work. Not looking forward to that. May just have to outsource.

4. The waiting I actually never really minded waiting for film to come back, it somehow made the whole process more exciting. There was adventure in anticipation. Of course, I was at a different stage in my career back then. I can’t imagine having to wait a full day, or even a whole three hours to see what my images look like now. Oh Lord, thank you for the LCD panel!

5. Having to reload at 36 If you were lucky, you could push it to 37 or 38. Sometimes I could load a manual camera and get 39 frames on a roll of film, but c’mon, 39? Are you serious? Talk about a momentum killer. We’re WAY spoiled now. These days I get 155 14-bit RAW photos on my 4GB cards. I’ll bet that those of you who use 8 and 16 gig cards and can shoot almost the entire day without reloading. How cool is that!

Ok, time to get back to Lightroom.

———

Dan Bailey is a professional adventure, outdoor and travel photographer based in Anchorage, Alaska. He just published his latest eBook, Making The Image- A Conceptual Guide to Creating Stronger Photographs. Follow his own blog at danbaileyphoto.com/blog, see his daily updates at facebook.com/danbaileyphoto and follow him on Twitter @Danbaileyphoto.

Bookmark and Share
Advertisements
  • Pingback: The Photoletariat

  • Pingback: Daniel H. Bailey

  • Pingback: David Terry

  • Pingback: Alexandre Buisse

  • Pingback: Ed Dombrowski

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IQO3XPXMC33HOHJKLF7OOQZRMU Joe

    14-bit?

  • http://twitter.com/hector_oca Héctor Julio Oca

    Maybe I'm the only that miss (for personal use only) the 35mm.? I really like that sensation of “wow, don't waste away your roll with that, think twice!”.

    I really learned a lot about being selective in photos. Also, 35mm. films will last, at least, your entire life! Digital probably not for some reasons (RAW because are propietary and in some years you can't open them, and JPG's maybe get lost in some low-quality CD).

    Don't think wrong about me: I LOVE digital, specially for work, but for my personal things, for fine art, for relaxing myself taking REAL PHOTOS, I prefer 35mm.

    Anybody with a Nikon F5-F6 here? :)

  • Pingback: Christopher Tvärne

  • Pingback: escapadepictures

  • Pingback: T.C.

  • Pingback: Roscoe P. Dunwoody

  • Pingback: Franky Steele

  • Pingback: Ashley Kemp

  • Pingback: Bryan Dorr

  • Pingback: Freddy Sarabia

  • jkfoto

    It is so much easier to get through airport security… no more worries about either arguing about hand checking your film (I remember when they *would*, sometimes…) or discovering that your film was fogged in the xray process.

  • Pingback: Jan Anne

  • Dan Bailey

    Oh, good point! Of course, all that increased computer time is not free, though, it costs energy. All in all, though I think digital offers some great benefits.

  • Jim

    I know exactly how you feel Dan……..I don't miss film at all either.

  • Kjphotog

    or knowing which fed ex you could deliver late to

  • http://www.jamesgilmore.net/blog Gilmore

    Pretty silly not to differentiate between the needs of commercial photogs and fine artists, IMHO. Also interesting that analog photography courses at colleges across America are bursting with students who want to learn “old-scool.”

    There's nothing quite like watching your first print come up in the developer, then scanning it and making a digital negative from which you can make a silver print from.

    Truth is that it's all good. I agree with simply using the term 'photography' – the medium has expanded to take many forms!

  • cybergabi

    Most important though: All the chemicals used for developing and processing, and the trash produced from slides/ film strips/ prints you really don't want to keep.

    Especially a nature photographer should also care about the environment!

  • Me

    F1, 2, 3, 4, 5 along with all Canon 1 series film cameras ever made. Love them.

    I love how so many current “photographers” believe in the spray and pray method of photography. Hell give a camera to a monkey and he will get some good shots too. Is that what you want to be compared to? Not me.

  • adawei

    Article is very interesting,thanks for your sharing.I will visit this site.And welcome to wedding dresses online shop.We supply supply high quality Cheap wedding dresses,wedding dresses 2011.We have been dress business 20 years and you can trust us completely.Our wedding dress shop have Evening Dresses,Prom Dresses,mother of the bride dresses,A-Line Wedding Dresses,Empire Wedding Dresses,Bridesmaid Dresses and so on.You can find your dream Beach Wedding Dresses here.We do retail and wholesale wedding dresses business.Choose http://www.weddingdressesshop…./, get your wedding dresses UK right now!

  • http://twitter.com/ohnostudio ohno studio

    I never thought I would do it but recently I've actually begun to reminisce about my old darkroom. I've been thinking of at least getting some tanks and doing my own film again. I do miss that part if it.

  • Pingback: Wide Receiver

Previous post:

Next post:

Advertisement